<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bigger is (not) Better in Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alphonseha.com/2009/09/bigger-is-better-in-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alphonseha.com/2009/09/bigger-is-better-in-social-media/</link>
	<description>Alphonse Ha: Social Media Marketing Strategies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 05:21:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrés de Rojas</title>
		<link>http://alphonseha.com/2009/09/bigger-is-better-in-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrés de Rojas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphonseha.com/?p=318#comment-46</guid>
		<description>My opinion is that paying attention to the number of followers (formerly known as audience) is a valid approach, but better used when talking about &quot;older&quot; media (TV, radio, printed newspaper...).

But if the great point of Facebook, Twitter and the whole web 2.0 is interactivity, then ReTweets and clicks, as I think Alphonse tries to point out, should be the real objective of the marketing strategy.

Yes, the size of our network still matters (it&#039;s the first step, anyways), but if we could go further and look for implication we should totally go for it.

@Michelle Blanc: I&#039;m sorry I cannot read in French yet so I just read the post you linked and cannot comment further on this... but the penis joke was perfectly understandable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion is that paying attention to the number of followers (formerly known as audience) is a valid approach, but better used when talking about &#8220;older&#8221; media (TV, radio, printed newspaper&#8230;).</p>
<p>But if the great point of Facebook, Twitter and the whole web 2.0 is interactivity, then ReTweets and clicks, as I think Alphonse tries to point out, should be the real objective of the marketing strategy.</p>
<p>Yes, the size of our network still matters (it&#8217;s the first step, anyways), but if we could go further and look for implication we should totally go for it.</p>
<p>@Michelle Blanc: I&#8217;m sorry I cannot read in French yet so I just read the post you linked and cannot comment further on this&#8230; but the penis joke was perfectly understandable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Blanc</title>
		<link>http://alphonseha.com/2009/09/bigger-is-better-in-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Blanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alphonseha.com/?p=318#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Dear Alphonse, I did not understand the joke about your penis, but there might be some personal issues there. Now, about my blabber nonsense, you probably do not understand my French correctly or you do not understand the subtlety there is in my post. By the way, if I talk bullshit about you in my blog, I will have the decency to post a link to your blog, so people (and myself) can read for themselves the false statements you are making.  Here it is: http://www.michelleblanc.com/2009/08/26/grosseur-compte-sur-medias-sociaux/ and in it, I quoted the very respected Brian Solis and his post http://www.briansolis.com/2009/08/size-matters-job-seekers-measure-the-size-of-your-social-graph/ That specifically said that size matters in recruiting so called social media edxperts. By size he did not mean humongous, like the 100 000 followers but rather the 250 Followers it takes to be a little somebody on twitter (you passed that test) and to be able to project that you know what you are talking about... 

For your information, I found your not that well researched post on socialmention.com, permitting me to correct the facts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Alphonse, I did not understand the joke about your penis, but there might be some personal issues there. Now, about my blabber nonsense, you probably do not understand my French correctly or you do not understand the subtlety there is in my post. By the way, if I talk bullshit about you in my blog, I will have the decency to post a link to your blog, so people (and myself) can read for themselves the false statements you are making.  Here it is: <a href="http://www.michelleblanc.com/2009/08/26/grosseur-compte-sur-medias-sociaux/" rel="nofollow">http://www.michelleblanc.com/2009/08/26/grosseur-compte-sur-medias-sociaux/</a> and in it, I quoted the very respected Brian Solis and his post <a href="http://www.briansolis.com/2009/08/size-matters-job-seekers-measure-the-size-of-your-social-graph/" rel="nofollow">http://www.briansolis.com/2009/08/size-matters-job-seekers-measure-the-size-of-your-social-graph/</a> That specifically said that size matters in recruiting so called social media edxperts. By size he did not mean humongous, like the 100 000 followers but rather the 250 Followers it takes to be a little somebody on twitter (you passed that test) and to be able to project that you know what you are talking about&#8230; </p>
<p>For your information, I found your not that well researched post on socialmention.com, permitting me to correct the facts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

